Team FeeOnly

Four Reforms To Enhance Trust In Insurance Sector

Insurance is the foundation of sound financial planning, yet widespread mis-selling in life insurance and claim denials in health insurance have eroded public trust. IRDAI’s proposed distribution reforms are a welcome step towards restoring confidence. The article advocates four key changes: measuring insurance success by protection coverage rather than premiums collected, launching commission-free insurance products through Bima Sugam, allowing fee-only insurance advisers, and making complaint and claim records publicly accessible. The central message is clear: Insurance must prioritise policyholder protection over commissions and sales, and trust must be earned through honest selling and reliable claim settlements.

Four Reforms To Enhance Trust In Insurance Sector Read More »

Bucket Strategy Deployed In Retirement Needs A Refill Rule

A retirement bucket strategy feels reassuring: keep a couple of years’ expenses in debt and leave the rest in equity. But the real challenge begins once that safe bucket starts getting spent. When should it be refilled—and from where?

Without a clear replenishment rule, the investor is forced to decide when markets are “good enough” to sell equity, introducing market timing and emotion into what was meant to be a simple strategy.

A hybrid fund addresses this through automatic rebalancing—selling some equity after rises and moving money from debt into equity after falls.

Truth be told, the bucket is only the container. **The refill rule is the strategy.**

Bucket Strategy Deployed In Retirement Needs A Refill Rule Read More »

The Gambling Problem Hidden Inside F&O

Kiran, a young Gen Z employee, was drawn to option buying by a social media “educator” who made it look like a low-risk way to make quick money. After losing money, he traded more to recover his losses, increased the size of his bets and eventually borrowed to continue. His debt became so large that his parents had to sell family jewellery to bail him out.

Kiran’s story is far from unusual. A SEBI study released in August 2026 found that 88% of individual traders lost money, while 97% were primarily or exclusively option buyers. Many continued trading after losses, hoping to recover what they had lost.

When someone repeatedly buys options to recover past losses, increases the amount after losing, borrows to continue and still cannot stop, it begins to look less like a bad investment decision and more like gambling addiction.

Until we recognise gambling dressed up as option buying for what it is, we may keep treating the wrong disease.

The Gambling Problem Hidden Inside F&O Read More »

Financially Free – What Next?

I spent years helping clients achieve financial freedom, but after selling my startup, I realised I had never asked myself what I wanted to be free for.

Over time, I learnt that money is rarely about returns alone. It is about what those returns make possible — the freedom to choose how we live, work, spend our time, and pursue what truly matters.

Financial freedom answers one question: “Will I have enough?”
But the more important question is: “What will I do when I no longer have to work?”

Purpose need not be grand. It could be family, mentoring, learning, helping others, or simply living differently. The real goal of financial planning may not be to become free from work, but to become free to choose what makes life meaningful.

Financially Free – What Next? Read More »

Regular to Direct Plan Switch: Is a Tax Levy Justified?

Ramesh had invested savings through his bank’s relationship manager in several below-par investments, including life insurance policies and mutual fund schemes. After reviewing his portfolio through an online analyser, he was advised to exit several investments but retain amounts in two mutual fund schemes, with one change: switch both from regular plans to direct plans to save the distributor commission paid to the bank.

Then came the surprise. One retained scheme had a substantial capital gain. Ramesh was told that switching from regular to direct would be treated as a sale, triggering capital gains tax. He was puzzled. He was not leaving the scheme, so why should there be tax?

The oddity becomes clearer because regular and direct plans of the same mutual fund scheme invest in the same underlying portfolio and are managed by the same fund manager. The key difference is that the regular plan carries distributor commission, while the direct plan does not. As a result, the direct plan generally delivers a higher return.

This does not mean every investor should choose direct plans. Many investors value the guidance and hand-holding offered by distributors and are willing to pay for it. But if they later decide that the service is no longer worth the cost, they should be free to stop paying the commission without tax becoming the deciding factor.

Strangely, an investor can change distributors without triggering tax because only the recipient of the commission changes. Yet stopping the commission altogether by moving to a direct plan can create a taxable event. The reverse is also true: a direct-plan investor moving to a regular plan can face the same issue.

Making switches between regular and direct plans tax-neutral should not result in revenue loss. The capital gain is not being forgiven; it remains embedded in the investment and can be taxed when the investor finally sells the units.

There is precedent. Earlier, when certain mutual fund schemes had separate institutional and retail plans with different expense structures, regulatory changes required these plans to be merged, and the Income-tax Act was amended to make that movement tax-neutral.

Truth be told, switching between different plans of the same mutual fund scheme should be tax-neutral. Investors should not have to pay tax merely to change how they manage the same investment. Until the law changes, tax will continue to influence a choice that should belong to the investor alone.

Regular to Direct Plan Switch: Is a Tax Levy Justified? Read More »

Why Some Investors Want Their Money Locked Away

Shankar, our long-time domestic staff member, wanted to secure his daughter’s education. When she was born, he asked me to deduct ₹2,000 from his salary every month, invest it, and not return the money to him—even if he asked—until she turned 18.

What he needed was simple: automatic monthly saving, long-term growth and a meaningful lock-in.

For people with limited financial resources, saving before the money reaches their bank account and restricting access afterwards can be extremely valuable. Emergencies, family obligations and everyday spending can otherwise gradually consume the amount. Automatic saving turns a monthly decision into a one-time commitment, while lock-in protects the accumulated corpus.

The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation shows how effective this combination can be. Salary contributions are deducted automatically, matched by employers and largely locked in until retirement. However, EPFO also shows that compulsory enrolment and difficult withdrawal processes can sometimes turn protection into a trap.

The National Pension System offers voluntary enrolment, salary deduction, lock-in and investment choice, but it is mainly designed for retirement. It does not address goals such as a child’s education.

A voluntary “goal-maturity mutual fund” could fill this gap. Investors could choose a maturity date, invest automatically every month and redeem only after that date. Such a product could combine the low cost and investment choice of mutual funds with disciplined saving and a real lock-in.

Close-ended mutual funds already have fixed maturity dates, but they currently cannot accept fresh investments after the initial offer period. Regulators could consider allowing continued contributions until maturity. Investors facing genuine emergencies could still sell the units on the stock exchange, preserving liquidity without making withdrawals too easy.

Since no suitable product existed, I arranged an equity-fund SIP for Shankar around his salary date. His dependence on me became a substitute for the lock-in the product lacked. A properly designed goal-maturity fund would have allowed him to choose how much to save, when the money should become available and where it should be invested—without needing such a jugaad arrangement.

Why Some Investors Want Their Money Locked Away Read More »

When timing the market hurts more than it helps

Markets usually call those instincts fear and greed. Fear protects what we already have. Greed, unfairly named, is the desire to improve one’s future. Years of accumulated capital become today’s rabbit. A rising market offers the deer. Investors naturally want both. Since markets do not allow certainty and upside together, they look for a third magical option: market timing. Stay invested while the market rises, sell at the highs, and buy back after the market has reached the bottom. The rabbit remains safe. The deer is captured. Problem solved. Except it isn’t.

Market timing demands the opposite of human behaviour. Near a market peak, nobody rings a bell. Everything looks reassuring. Near a bottom, every headline looks frightening and every decline seems to predict another. It asks investors to sell when every instinct says stay, and buy when every instinct screams run. That is why the promise is seductive, but the execution rare.

When timing the market hurts more than it helps Read More »

Scroll to Top
Secret Link

Vigilance Awareness Week 2025 (VAW2025)

Vigilance Awareness Week 2025 is being observed from October 27th to November 2nd, 2025, with the theme:

सतर्कता: हमारी साझा जिम्मेदारी (“Vigilance: Our Shared Responsibility”).

All stakeholders are encouraged to participate in the e-pledge initiative by visiting the CVC portal: https://pledge.cvc.nic.in/.