International

Why Some Investors Want Their Money Locked Away

Shankar, our long-time domestic staff member, wanted to secure his daughter’s education. When she was born, he asked me to deduct ₹2,000 from his salary every month, invest it, and not return the money to him—even if he asked—until she turned 18.

What he needed was simple: automatic monthly saving, long-term growth and a meaningful lock-in.

For people with limited financial resources, saving before the money reaches their bank account and restricting access afterwards can be extremely valuable. Emergencies, family obligations and everyday spending can otherwise gradually consume the amount. Automatic saving turns a monthly decision into a one-time commitment, while lock-in protects the accumulated corpus.

The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation shows how effective this combination can be. Salary contributions are deducted automatically, matched by employers and largely locked in until retirement. However, EPFO also shows that compulsory enrolment and difficult withdrawal processes can sometimes turn protection into a trap.

The National Pension System offers voluntary enrolment, salary deduction, lock-in and investment choice, but it is mainly designed for retirement. It does not address goals such as a child’s education.

A voluntary “goal-maturity mutual fund” could fill this gap. Investors could choose a maturity date, invest automatically every month and redeem only after that date. Such a product could combine the low cost and investment choice of mutual funds with disciplined saving and a real lock-in.

Close-ended mutual funds already have fixed maturity dates, but they currently cannot accept fresh investments after the initial offer period. Regulators could consider allowing continued contributions until maturity. Investors facing genuine emergencies could still sell the units on the stock exchange, preserving liquidity without making withdrawals too easy.

Since no suitable product existed, I arranged an equity-fund SIP for Shankar around his salary date. His dependence on me became a substitute for the lock-in the product lacked. A properly designed goal-maturity fund would have allowed him to choose how much to save, when the money should become available and where it should be invested—without needing such a jugaad arrangement.

Why Some Investors Want Their Money Locked Away Read More »

When paying fees hurts: Why investors favour commissions

When Paying Fees Hurts: Why Investors Favour Commissions
Nobel Prize–winning behavioural economist Richard Thaler showed that people spend far more when the payment feels painless — like using a credit card instead of cash. The “pain of paying” is strong when money leaves your hand, but much weaker when the cost is hidden or delayed. The salience also drops because the price of a ticket gets buried among dozens of items in the credit-card bill. A ₹10,000 ticket feels expensive on its own, but as part of an ₹80,000 bill it seems acceptable.
This simple insight explains why investors resist paying visible fees to advisers but readily accept commissions embedded in financial products. Fees deducted from investments (as in PMS) are also less painful than fees paid separately by cheque.

This pattern holds worldwide: wherever investors can choose between commissions and fees, most pick commissions because they feel painless. Only in countries like the UK and Australia — which have banned commissions — do large numbers of investors pay fees directly.

When paying fees hurts: Why investors favour commissions Read More »

Weigh the risks of EB-5 citizenship route

Originating in Africa, Humans migrated to the remotest corners of the earth primarily to find food, avoid the threat of deadly predators or the danger from domination by other human species or due to dramatic changes in the climate. There is an intriguing scientific theory that unforced migration is motivated by simple curiosity and boredom, what is often called wanderlust. This is credited to a variation in the human DNA (DRD4-7R) now dubbed the “wanderlust gene”. Present in about 20% of the population, it impacts dopamine levels, increasing the person’s tolerance for risk taking including exploring new territories. Those willing for (or seeking) greener pastures in other countries have a larger capacity for risk taking. But can that innate larger risk taking ability justify staking your life savings in an “risky investment for citizenship” plan like US’s EB-5. Harsh’s article in Business Standard today. Your feedback most welcome.

Weigh the risks of EB-5 citizenship route Read More »

Restrictions on foreign spends erode Brand India

The 20% deposit requirement imposed on overseas remittances inhibits all citizens from spending or investing overseas. The sweeping inhibitory measure is supposedly to catch a few wrong doers who abuse the Liberalised Remittance Scheme who anyways could , with a little dilligence, be identified from the mass of data that the department has. Harsh’s article in Business Standard on the long term costs of inhibiting/restricting our ordinary citizens from spending and/or investing overseas and the impact such measures have on our aspiration to be a Super power.

Restrictions on foreign spends erode Brand India Read More »

Scroll to Top
Secret Link

Vigilance Awareness Week 2025 (VAW2025)

Vigilance Awareness Week 2025 is being observed from October 27th to November 2nd, 2025, with the theme:

सतर्कता: हमारी साझा जिम्मेदारी (“Vigilance: Our Shared Responsibility”).

All stakeholders are encouraged to participate in the e-pledge initiative by visiting the CVC portal: https://pledge.cvc.nic.in/.